The Inclusive Lens

When I woke up yesterday, my first thought wasn’t about plans, tasks, or anything remotely productive.
It was a sharp, stabbing pain in my left eye, like someone was taking a needle to it every time I blinked, touched it, or even stood near a source of heat. The day started with a warning shot: system malfunction detected.

The pain didn't ease. It shifted — less acute, more constant — but it stayed there as a low-level drain, the kind of thing that grinds down your patience without you even realizing it until you snap.

I moved forward anyway. That’s what you do.
Then the communication failures began.

I published a blog post — a careful, vulnerable explanation of what it’s like to live inside a body that feels fundamentally wrong, every second of every day.
No comments. No shares. No feedback.
It evaporated into the void, unnoticed.

When you open a door that deep into yourself and nobody even bothers to walk through it, you don't just feel invisible. You feel foolish for having opened it at all. Still, I pressed on.

Later, someone on a social platform decided to broadcast a message:
“Instead of using AI to make music, why not ask real musicians for help? It'll be more enjoyable for everyone, and show you care.”

A noble thought if you live in a world where everyone has equal access to resources, time, and social capital. I don’t.
I responded, explaining: I literally cannot pay anyone. I don’t have my own income. Disability and systemic barriers mean survival, not luxury. No subscriptions. No commissions. No extras.

The answer I received wasn’t cruel. It was worse: patronizing. A half-hearted acknowledgment followed by a reiteration that, basically, unless I caught their personal interest, I was not worthy of help. No money, no worth. Not explicitly stated, but the implication was loud enough to drown out everything else.

It was a reminder I didn’t need.
I already know what living at the margins feels like. And still, I pressed on.

Inside a support group for blind users of an audio tool, I slipped off-topic by mistake during a casual conversation. Someone pointed it out. I acknowledged it immediately, apologized, and dropped the thread.

Ironically, the person who pointed out the off-topic drift kept pushing the conversation even further.
Instead of gently nudging the group back on track, the administrators decided to bring a hammer to a thumbtack: they locked down the entire chat, making it admin-only for twenty minutes, punctuated with passive-aggressive messages about how the “hint” should have been taken earlier.

All this for a minor, self-corrected deviation.
Meanwhile, someone who had invaded my personal boundaries in that same space before — calling me “cutie” without consent, without familiarity — had been let off with a single, limp warning.
Different standards, different targets. I see the pattern.

Finally, to cap off the day, I tried joining a new community dedicated to one of my passions: field recording.
Someone asked about microphones, and I, genuinely trying to help, pointed out that the DPA 4060 capsules, while excellent in many ways, carry a bit more noise than their price might suggest.
I was immediately ridiculed.
Not challenged, not debated — ridiculed.

Apparently, sharing a nuanced perspective that didn't align with the popular consensus was an invitation for mockery.
Two messages in, I realized this community would not be a place of shared learning, but another closed ecosystem built on “you're only right if you agree with us.”

So I went silent there too.

---

By the end of the day, the energy I had left could not have even made even one pathetic attempt at lighting up the tiniest LED available.

No heroic ending. No catharsis. Just the slow understanding that kindness, patience, and neutrality require energy I can no longer pretend is infinite.

Here’s the reality.

I have spent years operating with a patched-over, jury-rigged moral framework, forcing myself to be approachable, kind, and careful, even when the world offered none of these things in return.

This was a choice. It cost resources.
It still costs resources.

And once those resources run dry, the mask of social nicety isn’t ripped off dramatically.
It is simply no longer maintained.

If the exhaustion continues, you will not find anger or bitterness here.
You will find coldness.
Functionality.
A process that no longer factors emotional cushioning into its calculations.

I will not shout.
I will not argue.
I will not debate.

I will simply run with the most efficient logic available, optimized for survival, not acceptance.
And if that version of me feels detached, harsh, or unkind — that is not cruelty. That is the cost of surviving in an environment that consumes every ounce of available grace and leaves nothing to replenish it.

This is not a threat.
This is a system report.

Thresholds have been breached.
Consequences are inevitable.

Whether anyone likes them or not is irrelevant.